
If your company imports goods from China, you've felt the weight of Section 301 tariffs. At rates of 25% or higher on thousands of product categories — and now 100% on electric vehicles, 50% on solar cells — these duties aren't a rounding error. They're a direct hit to margins that can make or break a product's profitability.
Here's what most importers don't know: up to 99% of those duties are legally refundable through a U.S. government program called duty drawback. The program has existed for decades, but Section 301 tariffs — which only escalated significantly starting in 2018 — added billions in new refundable duties to the pile.
The catch? Filing a drawback claim is notoriously difficult. As one customs broker noted, "the hurdle wasn't physically calculating the drawback, but getting the paperwork." This guide breaks down exactly what's eligible, what the official process requires, and why most companies never see a refund despite being fully entitled to one.
According to official CBP guidance, duties paid under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 are eligible for duty drawback. So are Section 201 duties (global safeguard tariffs).
One critical exception: Section 232 duties on steel and aluminum are explicitly ineligible for drawback under Presidential Proclamations 9739 and 9740. If your goods are subject to both Section 301 and Section 232 duties — which can happen with certain steel or aluminum products from China — only the Section 301 portion is recoverable.
This distinction matters. Claiming the wrong duty category creates compliance risk, and missing the Section 232 carve-out is a common mistake for companies new to drawback.
Section 301 tariffs were originally imposed in 2018–2019 targeting Chinese imports across hundreds of Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) categories. They've been expanded and escalated multiple times since.
Based on finalized USTR actions, the most significant rate increases include:
For companies importing in any of these categories — and the hundreds of others still carrying 25% Section 301 rates — the refund opportunity is substantial. If you're exporting finished goods or re-exporting imported merchandise, you may be sitting on a significant and unclaimed cash recovery.
The drawback program is governed by 19 U.S.C. § 1313 and was modernized by the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act (TFTEA) in 2015. Here's what the official process requires for Section 301 drawback claims specifically.
Generally, claims must be filed within the statutory time limits — typically five years from the date of import and three years from the date of export, though specific rules vary by drawback type. These deadlines are strictly enforced by CBP, and many companies discover they have recoverable duties only after they've already expired.
This is where Section 301 claims differ from standard drawback. When filing a claim that includes Section 301 duties, you must report both the Chapter 99 HTS number (which is how Section 301 tariffs are coded) and the underlying Chapter 1–97 HTS number for the product itself. These must be listed in the same order as they appear on the original import entry in CBP's Automated Commercial Environment (ACE) system.
Getting this wrong is one of the most common reasons Section 301 drawback claims are rejected or delayed.
You'll need complete records for both the import and the export side of the transaction:
Refunds are processed only after the original import entries have been liquidated by CBP and a full compliance review is complete.
The law is clear and the eligibility is real. So why do billions of dollars in eligible refunds go unclaimed every year?
It comes down to the operational reality of filing a claim — which is far more painful than the statute suggests. In practice, getting the documentation right is a full-time job that most supply chain and trade teams simply don't have bandwidth for.
One experienced customs broker shared that when they dug into a client's drawback history, "probably 60 to 70% were missing some sort of paperwork to complete it" — and that was after cherry-picking shipments to pass the audit. That's not an edge case. It's the norm.
The specific operational barriers are deeply embedded in the traditional, manual process.
The foundational data for a drawback claim rarely lives in one place. Import records are in an ERP, export documents are in emails or shipper portals, and commercial invoices and bills of lading are often stored as siloed PDFs. Manually gathering, cleaning, and linking this data for every import-export pair is enormously time-consuming and where most internal efforts fail.
The core of any drawback claim is proving the connection between what came in and what went out. Traditional providers do this manually in Excel. With thousands of line items across hundreds of entries, it's impossible to compute every possible match by hand. As a result, they use simplified "first-in, first-out" logic that leaves legitimate refund money unclaimed.
Traditional drawback providers typically take 9–12 months to file and secure a refund. For manufacturers with tight working capital, having cash flow locked up for nearly a year is a significant financial drag. This long wait time discourages many companies from pursuing claims at all.
Because the manual process is so labor-intensive, most legacy providers won't take clients unless they have at least $100,000 in annual refund potential. This leaves a significant segment of importers—mid-market manufacturers, retailers, and distributors—with no viable way to recover duties they are legally owed.
The result: billions in legally recoverable Section 301 duties go unclaimed every year not because companies aren't eligible, but because the process is too difficult to navigate without the right infrastructure.
Technology has fundamentally changed what's possible here. The same drawback program that took 9–12 months to navigate manually can now be handled end-to-end in weeks — with better refund outcomes.
Here's how the two approaches compare:
The math is the same whether you're a Fortune 500 manufacturer or a $15M importer. The Section 301 duties you paid are sitting in a recoverable pool. The only question is whether your process is capable of reaching them.
The legal answer to the question this article started with is unambiguous: yes, Section 301 tariffs are drawback-eligible. If your company has imported goods subject to those tariffs and subsequently exported them — or manufactured finished goods for export using them as inputs — you have a refundable claim sitting uncollected.
The real barrier isn't the law. It's the operational complexity of a process that was designed in an era of paper-based trade compliance and hasn't been updated at most providers since. The paperwork burden, the manual matching, the 9–12 month wait — these are process failures, not legal ones.
If you're not sure whether your import and export activity qualifies, or want to estimate how much you might be able to recover, a free eligibility assessment is the lowest-risk way to find out. There are no upfront costs — our pricing is entirely performance-based, meaning we only earn when you receive a refund. And with a 10–15 working day processing timeline, you'll have an answer — and potentially a check — far sooner than the traditional process would suggest is possible.
Duty drawback is a U.S. government program that allows for the refund of up to 99% of duties, taxes, and fees paid on imported goods that are later exported or used to manufacture exported goods. Our platform helps companies navigate this complex process to recover these funds.
Your company is likely eligible if you import goods from China subject to Section 301 tariffs and then export those same goods, or use them to manufacture products that you export. A free eligibility assessment can confirm your specific refund potential and chart a path to recovery.
Generally, you have five years from the import date and three years from the export date to file a drawback claim. These statutory deadlines are strictly enforced by CBP, so it's critical to review your import history for any recoverable duties that may be expiring soon.
The process is difficult due to extensive documentation requirements and the need to meticulously trace imports to exports. This often involves gathering data from multiple disconnected systems, which is why an estimated 80% of eligible refunds go unclaimed. Our platform automates this data work.
It depends on your provider. Traditional manual drawback services can take 9–12 months to secure a refund. Our automated platform typically processes and files claims within 10–15 working days, allowing you to receive your refund from CBP in just a few weeks.
No. While Section 301 and Section 201 duties are eligible, Section 232 duties on steel and aluminum are specifically excluded from the drawback program. It is important to correctly identify which duties apply to your goods to ensure compliance and maximize your refund.
Substitution drawback allows you to match exports with imports of "commercially interchangeable" goods, not just the exact same items. This provision of the Trade Facilitation and Trade Enforcement Act (TFTEA) significantly broadens refund opportunities, especially for manufacturers using common inputs.
You will need complete import and export records, including commercial invoices, bills of lading, and CBP Form 7501 (Entry Summary). For manufacturing claims, you also need records linking the imported components to the exported finished goods. Our system helps you compile and organize this data.